| Evening 14ºC  | Morning 19ºC |
 |
Read the latest instalment of the Mail's coverage of the death of Princess Diana...more
It only takes ten minutes on the phone to trigger dangerous brain chemical changes, scientists say
Mobile phones can take as little as ten minutes to trigger changes in the brain associated with cancer, scientists claimed yesterday.
They found even low levels of radiation from handsets interfere with the way brain cells divide. Cell division encourages the growth of tumours.
Although the researchers did not come up with evidence that mobile phone signals are harmful, the findings suggest they could be.
Several major studies have also found no link between mobile use and brain tumours, nor a dramatic rise in cancer rates.
But campaigners insist the discovery undermines official advice that the devices are safe.
The guidance is based on the assumption that the phones emit too little radiation to heat the brain dangerously.
However, the new study by the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel suggests "nonthermal" radiation could pose a risk.
The Israeli scientists exposed human and rat cells in a laboratory to low-level radiation at 875 megahertz - a similar frequency to the one used in many mobile phones.
Although the radiation was far weaker than emissions from a typical handset, it began to switch on a chemical signal inside the cells within ten minutes, the researchers report in the Biochemical Journal.
The chemical signals they detected were involved in the division of cells.
The researchers say the reaction was not caused by heating and claim they have found a separate way in which mobile phones could damage health.
Dr Rony Seger, a co-author of the study, told the magazine New Scientist: "The significance lies in showing cells do react to cellphone radiation in a non-thermal way."
Although changes in the chemical pathway seen by the Israeli scientists have been linked to several cancers, the researchers say there was no sign of a cancer-causing effect.
Dr Simon Arthur, a health expert at Dundee University, said the effect was 'unlikely to cause cancer'.
Dr Dariusz Leszczynski, of the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Helsinki, said: "If cell-phone radiation cannot induce biological effects then there will never be any health effects.
"On the other hand if we can show this radiation is able to induce biological effects then we have a different story."
A major review of mobile phone safety is due to be published by the Health Protection Agency next month.
The agency's last major report, in 2004, found no evidence mobiles were a serious health risk. It did, however, caution against excessive use, especially by the young.
Dr Michael Clark, a spokesman for the agency, said: "Because of findings like this that pop up from time to time, a precautionary approach is justified."
Graham Philips, of campaign group Powerwatch, said: "Safety guidelines assume health effects from mobiles can only occur when significant heating of body tissue occurs.
"This study shows biological changes in response to low-level mobile phone radiation - something that could potentially have implications for health.
"Further research is required, however guidance based purely on thermal effects is clearly out of date."
Add your comment
|
View all
Comments (5)
5 people have commented on this story so far. Tell us what you think below.
Here's a sample of the latest comments published. You can click view all to read all
comments that readers have sent in.
So what about the wireless computer networks in schools? Children are being subjected to a constant bombardment of wireless radiation, just because it's cheaper and more convenient than installing cabling. It's crazy and irresponsible to say "there is no evidence of a problem", or that the radiation is within "safe limits" (which are generally set quite arbitrarily). True it's hard to prove a negative, but just assuming that the abscence of positive evidence of harm means there is no problem is just mad. Sometimes, maybe often, you have to make decisions on very limited, or no, evidence, and use precautions.
- Anonymous, Manchester
If this were true, half the population of the world would be dead or dying. Oh well, at least we wouldn't have to worry about overpopulation for quite a few years to come! Maybe it would even help out with global warming.
- Janet Fuls, Cottonwood, CA, USA
Where are all these brain cancers then?
- Kim Rymer, Brighton, UK
This story first appeared in the 
. For more stories like this, buy the Daily Mail every day. Plus, to get the paper delivered to your home click here.
Mail to a friend 
Print story 
Read later
Golden bald - is crocked Beckham losing his hair?
It appears the stress of David Beckham's troubled football career is beginning to taking its toll on his once prized head of golden locks
Is he taking the Rhys? Sienna and Ifans get drunk again
They're at it again: 'friends' Sienna Miller and Rhys Ifans hit the town having knocked back one too many celebratory drinks
Desperate Housewives return in blaze of airbrushed glory
The cast of Desperate Housewives have unveiled a red hot new look to promote the show's fourth season
Britney's millions: How troubled star banks £4.5m a year without working
She hasn't released an album since 2003, yet Britney Spears is banking a staggering £4.5 million a year, according to documents relating to the star's bitter custody battle with ex-Kevin Federline
The shocking truth of how Arthur Miller hid his Downs Syndrome son from the world
Arthur Miller, the American playwright and former husband of Marilyn Monroe, hid the existence of a son born with Down's Syndrome for nearly four decades, it has emerged
Comments (5)
